Seven years ago, global warming activists immortalized Elon Musk and his Tesla Model 3 EV for saving the Earth from planetary existential from carbon emissions. Less than fifty days after Musk began participating in the second Donald Trump Administration, anti-Trump ideologues were destroying Tesla EVs with Molotov cocktails and shooting into the windows of Tesla dealerships. Global warming alarmists were strangely silent as fires consumed a key symbol supporting what became the world’s largest Ponzi Scheme.
But pursuing climate change in America was already a dying ember. Thirty minutes after Donald Trump took office on January 20th, he announced the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris International Climate Accords. The accords were first negotiated in 2015 to eliminate carbon emissions which were claimed to create global warming. In announcing his second withdrawal from the Accords, Trump stated, “One-sided Paris climate accord rip-off…the United States will not sabotage our own industries while China pollutes with impunity.”
Executive orders followed to overturn Biden’s program to obtain ‘100 percent zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) acquisitions by 2035, including 100 percent zero-emission light-duty vehicle acquisitions by 2027.’
The other major component of Biden’s 2021 green energy plan (NET ZERO 50) was to have ‘100 percent carbon pollution-free electricity (CFE) by 2030, at least half of which will be locally supplied clean energy to meet 24/7 demand.’ This program was set back when the administration took ‘a broadside against the wind industry, pausing new leases for offshore projects and halting new permits pending a review’.
Following these actions by the Trump Administration, the global warming beneficiaries were highly noticeable by their total absence from the scene.
Government funding supporting the Green Energy Ponzi Scheme began unraveling when the Stacey Adams Federal Criminal Racketeering model was revealed by the $2 billion global warming grant to eliminate natural gas home kitchen stovetops. This scheme progressively launders vast sums of money from the federal coffers into the pockets of political supporters presumably with portions of it recycled into the pockets of their Congressional benefactors.
Only modest curiosity would have raised serious questions about a $2 billion federal grant to Power Forward Communities (PFC), a non-profit corporation with no operations, no capital, as few as eight employees, no visibility, no history, and no list of officers and directors found upon an internet search.
With American support withdrawn from green energy initiatives, global warming alarms in Western Europe were muted.
Harvard’s green energy programs have been closely tied to Chinese influence through the Harvard-China Project funded in 1993. The Faculty Chair of that project recently published his view for “The Green Star State” in the March-April 2025 Harvard Magazine. This article projected a fanciful projection of Texas producing green hydrogen from solar cells to fuel vehicles. A plan like this would rely on Texas replacing its current base electric power generation with more solar and wind with battery backup. Its energy costs and reliability will reduce Texas to another energy disaster area which has become the norm in California – highly dependent on Chinese solar panels, windmills, and batteries.
In 2022, a Hong Kong billionaire donated $200 million to Harvard. The gift was used to create the Salata Institute for Climate and Sustainability which ‘will spur and support influential research on climate, sustainability, and the transition to low- and zero-carbon energy’, a purpose at odds with current governmental policy. Once federally funded green energy programs are reviewed, Harvard’s federal grants could face scrutiny and loss.
Donations for green policy initiatives at Harvard are also received through John Kerry, Biden’s U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate. His wife, Theresa Hines, controls the John Heinz Family Foundation which funded the Senator John Heinz Professor of Environmental Management at Harvard Business School. Recent graduates from the HBS green energy programs will likely bring Chinese influence into American corporate life.
Already the inability and will of Ivy League’s prestigious Columbia University to protect its students in the face of anti-Semitic/Pro-Hamas on-campus rioters has caused federal grants to the University to be suspended upon review. $400 million of grant money is already at risk at Columbia. Harvard’s recent handling of similar issues is equally questionable, just not as viral as has been experienced at Columbia. Harvard’s collaboration with Chinese influencers may also cause Harvard officials to be entertaining government inspectors.
The Great Green Energy Ponzi Scheme did not alone cause the annual U.S. federal deficit to skyrocket to $1.8 Trillion in 2024, however, locking its Thieves in the Night away from the federal Treasury will reduce the deficit’s rapid recent increase. University researchers will no longer be assured that federal grant money will be automatically awarded by adding the suffix ‘global warming’ or ‘climate change’ into their grant’s title. Lack of funding will ensure that Stacy Abram’s shell companies will disappear into the night.
Cries from the United Nations to fund solar energy where the sun seldom shines or wind turbines where breezes are sporadic will fall on Washington’s ears which suddenly became deaf. Xi Jinping’s scheme to own America’s energy industry will be replaced with idle manufacturing plants and an increasingly floundering economy easing the pressure on Taiwan’s independence.
And a $1 Trillion or more Ponzi Scheme will be shut down. Elections do make a difference!
TW3
John Whitmore Jenkins
March 27, 2025